Tuesday, June 27, 2017

Commercial Review: Reward to Those Who Seek No Rewards

Reward to Those Who Seek No Rewards

Agency: Slava, Moscow
Client: Ferrero Russia

What is the most effective way to advertise a chocolate company?  Like with most candies, the solution seems to be with emotion.  Emotional advertising finds its strengths in the fact that it bleeds bittersweet happiness that just incites consumers to buy more to feel that same emotion.  Emotional advertising makes us want to contribute.

And then there’s Russia.

That’s not to say that they didn’t succeed.  In their advertisement for Ferrero Russia, agency Slava crafted a story around a lighthouse keeper that works every night, even on New Years Eve.  As a thank you for his dedicated service, one that he does without thanks, a group of sailors are shown contributing to buy him a New Year’s gift of Ferrero chocolates, prompting consumers to do the same for their loved ones.


Cinematically, the spot is gorgeous, and there is a certain charm in the straightforward attitude of all the sailors that makes the advertisement unmistakably Russian.  Despite its success, however, it’s not exactly original.  Most of the elements of the commercial rely on techniques tried and true, telling a story that has been told thousands of times not only by ad agencies, but also by films.  “Good things come to those who wait” and all that.  Overall, the commercial is appealing, but there isn’t anything compelling about it that lends itself to be watched again.  A possible solution would be to provide more insight into the characters, but overall, if they want to be creative, they might need to find a different story.  Nevertheless, it was a good commercial, and I’m certain that it succeeded in promoting holiday purchases.

Commercial Review: Guilty Clothes

Guilty Clothes

Agency: Marvelous, Moscow
Client: The Survivors Trust (CYMRU)

This ad campaign didn’t start out as a TV commercial.  It started out as guerrilla marketing, advertising an independent fashion show during Fashion Week.  With several taglines incenting an audience for the sexiest fashion show around, the event began in a small loft apartment with a runway through the middle of it.  And then the show started.

Women walked down the runway.  Jeans.  Vests.  Sweaters.  Workplace uniforms.  Three layers of jackets.  Not one miniskirt in sight.  Nothing too revealing, nothing that anyone would consider to be “sexy”.  And then the large screen at the head of the runway came to light, and the audience watched as women began to give their testimonies about what they were wearing when they were sexually assaulted.


From this footage the ad campaign was created.  The message was that clothes are never to blame for sexual assault, and neither are the victims.  Instead, blame was placed solely in the assaulter.  And it was effective.  It was a form of emotional advertising that didn’t just build itself off of a commercial.

Instead, it crafted its message both online and in the real world.  By focusing on individual stories within the project, it drove home even more how unjustly the victims of sexual assault are treated.  There isn’t much that can really be improved on with this commercial, except that the event only happened once.  If anything, it deserves more screen time, perhaps with repeated events at fashion shows around the globe.

Commercial Review: Crabziness

Crabziness

Agency: Vokshod, Ekaterinberg
Client: Vičiūnai Group

The Crabziness campaign was an online campaign that took advantage of YouTube preroll ads by inciting audience participation.  On the original add, there would of course be the “Skip Ad” button, but they added another one that would “add crab” to the commercial.  Clicking on the advertisement itself would cause crabs to take over the commercial, resulting in a heavy metal jam session, an opera solo, and more zany madness.

Effectively, this advertisement caused 53% of complete commercials viewed instead of being skipped, with an increate of 5x video watch for the ads advertising the crab strips.  Overall, there was a large post-modern aesthetic to the campaign, relying on a millennial sense of Internet humor and memes that were risky in hitting their marks.  Even further, the campaign relied heavily on audience interaction, which was not guaranteed considering that the “add crab” button wasn’t very obvious against the already-chaotic scenery in the shot.


A large improvement to this ad would be to make the prompt for audience interaction far more apparent.  Providing more incentive for the audience to click the button would make the commercial more relevant at the same time.  Without this guarantee, a large potential of the campaign was lost, and it didn’t give a full effect to the audience.  Nevertheless, for an internet commercial, it was a creative idea that drove home the power of random encounters.

June 24, 2017 – Cannes Lions Day 8: #MentalHealthDay #Debussy

Compared to the final days of the Film Festival, the Cannes Lions festival came to an end rather quietly.  Sure, there was the final awards ceremony, just as with the Film Festival, but for some reason much of the energy just wasn’t there.  Maybe it was the heat, or the fact that we’d been out late the night before for YouTube Pride, but I found it odd considering that the Film Festival had gone on for four additional days in comparison.

Needless to say, I was exhausted.

We spent the morning in the Debussy Theatre, the only place where talks were happening for the entire day.  Courtney, Ellis, Shona, Paige, Asunta and I generally stayed in the same seats for four hours watching talks, with some adjustments as people left and came back.  Me?  I will admit I took a nap.  But nevertheless, I also took notes.

The first talk we went to, I Fell in Love with an Asshole, was an unexpected gem to be found during this session.  The talk, hosted by The Martin Agency, featured speakers Jenny Rooney of Forbes Media, David Fleming of Donate Life, Joe Alexander of The Martin Agency, and filmmakers Will Speck and Josh Gordon, who came together with Fleming and Alexander to create the ad campaign The World’s Biggest Asshole for Donate Life.

The advertisement itself was hilarious, winning a Gold Lion later in the evening.  The talk, however, focused more on its effectiveness at getting young men between the demographics of 18 and 35 to sign up as organ donors.  A large issue was with the fact that the advertisement didn’t appeal to women, taking a risk by labelling itself so blatantly as an ad for “assholes”.  However, this was not the intended demographic.

It put into light a lot of discussion that the Cannes Lions festival had overall regarding women in the advertising industry.  Because, while diversity is certainly necessary, is there a point where diversity can actually hinder creativity?  If a specific demographic needs to be reached, are all opinions equally as valid?  These are the questions that were brought up during the production of this commercial.  Personally, I feel that this specific campaign was a special case that, while it paid off, needed more support from a millennial agency than from an older generation, simply for the humor they were going for.  In this same way, that is a demographic of diversity that is starting to make its way into the industry.

The majority of the talks for the rest of the morning passed fairly quietly.  Facing Our Fear: Live was an interesting experiment in a live presentation that came across too distant and similar to a TED talk.  This Talk Isn’t Very Good – Dancing with My Inner Critic was short, and also fleeting.  And of course, The Titanium Trend Briefing: The One to Win. The One to Watch. became a preview of the award show that, honestly, almost spoiled it.

However, one talk in between these that stood out tremendously was by Michelle Morgan from Livity.  When your Passion Burns out Suddenly and Violently was a tremendous look at how to avoid being overworked, and how to address mental illness.  We all have to take our mental health days.  However, I know that I am guilty of pushing myself too far and taking on too much, burning myself out.  (Not to mention the struggle I face with ADD, anxiety, depression, and severe paranoia that is symptomatic of PTSD.)  Morgan touched the audience with her own story of her struggle, and it’s one that reached many of us personally.

It was a highlight of the day, giving us all a moment to sit back and reassess our own roles and how to manage ourselves knowing our own limits.  I know that I need to take a break every once in a while.  Even further, I know that I need to find a job where it’s not so much stressful as it is exhilarating.  That’s probably why I’m going into film; it’s easy to find passion there, whenever I’m on set.

Following this talk, we had three hours to kill, so we got an early dinner at an Italian restaurant.  

However, still feeling a little burnt out from the day as a whole (and probably from the entire festival), I left dinner to get in line early and have a moment of solitude.


I ended up sitting with Dominique, Brittany, Sahar, KC, and Raina during the awards show, which, thanks to the Titanium Lions Briefing, were just as predictable as I had expected.  Still, Juan Senor is a god of a man, and I think I might miss him the most.

Monday, June 26, 2017

June 23, 2017 – Cannes Lions Day 7: #HAPPYPRIDE #AlsoLumiere

Long story short, today was the best day of my entire summer.  Yes, probably better than the entirety of the Film Festival, simply because I’m still pissed that Coppola won.

I will probably always be mad about that.

Those terrible feeling aside, however, today was an awesome day that has to be memorialized in glitter and terrible decisions.  That’s right, it was Pride.

Here’s the thing, I missed Pride in Atlanta this year to come to France.  Yeah, I was a little bummed, but I mean, it’s France, so there really isn’t any reason I should be complaining.  That being said, imagine how stoked I was to discover that YOUTUBE BEACH WAS THROWING THEIR OWN ALL-DAY PRIDE PARTY!!!!

Those exclamation points are necessary.  Perhaps I need even more.

But I didn’t go to Pride immediately.  No, I started off the day with a very reasonable stint in the Lumiere Theatre.  It was a little disconcerting, actually, that after the Entertainment Lions had ended, the Palais was almost completely dead.  The only events happening were in the Lumiere for the entire day.  So Shona and I took a hint and camped out in the balcony for the morning, spending about four hours watching talks.

We started off great… and then went downhill.

The first talk, ‘Can’t Stop the Feeling’: Emotional Advertising, a Masterclass was riveting.  Hosted by IPA and adam&eveDDB, the seminar features speakers Craig Inglis fom John Lewis and James Murphey and Richard Brim, the masterminds behind the John Lewis Christmas ads.  I believe I mentioned this in my application interview, but he John Lewis ads are always among my favorites every year.  There is a cinematic quality to them that inspires me as a filmmaker, and further comforts me that advertising can be a stimulating career path with my skills.

I loved this talk; they discussed what led to creative advertising, and also how emotional advertising lent itself the courtesy of not necessarily having to be “on brand”.  That is, the advertising doesn’t have to be obviously about the product, as long as there is some connection.  Most of the John Lewis ads aren’t explicitly about the store, but the emotional connection to giving gifts and showing commitment that the ads create in the audience leads them to find an outlet for this emotion: and John Lewis is there to provide.  This is the purpose of emotional advertising; it leads consumers to become as attached to the brand as they are to the advertisements themselves.

Following this talk, things started to get… boring isn’t the correct term, but they didn’t capture my attention.  I could blame my ADD, but I equally blame the fact that I had things to read on my phone.  That being said, I probably didn’t pay enough attention to the next talk as I should have.  

What I did glean from the presentation by Christine Lagarde from the IMF, however, was mostly platitudes that I’d heard many times before along the lines of the presence of women in business.  Not that I disagree, but I felt I’d heard the same things from Helen Mirren.  Others who have better attention spans than I do (and who are probably just better people) have told me that the talk was amazing, though, so I’m probably going to end up streaming it again later this week.

The final talk I saw in the Lumiere, though, was just… it was terrible.  We’d been told to attend the Martin Sorrell interview with Ron Howard and Robert Kraft.  I was expecting a lot from this, and don’t get me wrong, I loved everything that Howard had to say.

But Kraft.  Oh my god, I don’t think I’ve ever heard such kinds of nonsense outside of Fox News.  “If you compare our domestic violence statistics to the rest of the NFL, we’re below average.  We’re actually not that bad.”  ARE YOU KIDDING ME?  Don’t get me started on his business plans.

I know a lot of people that walked out of this talk.  I almost did myself.  It’s enough that I ended up leaving afterwards, instead of staying for the next talk.  I really just wanted to get to YouTube Beach.

And boy am I glad I did.

I got to meet Laganja Estranja, one of the contestants on RuPaul’s Drag Race, and then I proceeded to get a dance lesson from her!  And even more, I met amazing people, got a free shirt, and painted glitter on my face.  Basically, I had the time of my life.

I feel like there is some way that I should describe Pride.  But at the same time, there isn’t a way that’s necessarily appropriate or relevant to this blog.  We ended up not getting home until 2:30 AM, and I know for a fact that there were many others who got home even later.  The party never stops, and I’m so proud to be who I am.

Pride is a celebration.  It’s fun, it’s loud, and it woke me up and brought me back to a good mood following some of the talks in the morning.


If only I could finally wash all of this glitter out of my hair.

Thursday, June 22, 2017

June 22, 2017 – Cannes Lions Day 6: #DayAfterHumpDay #WhyAmISoTired

The Internet is working, I am writing my blog, and I am exhausted.  Which makes no sense, because last night was my early night.  The Internet was down, and I had no choice but to read and sleep.  So I did that: I read and slept.

Why am I tired?  Body, brain, will you just get your shit together?

That being said, today was a good day, even if it started an hour late than I’d meant it to.
We started off the day with a coffee at the PRWeek cabana, and then a talk with Facebook Blueprint.  Which, by the way, is a brilliant platform, and I plan on getting my certification in July while I’m on break in between semesters.  I learned so much from this session, and now I’m actually curious to apply these techniques to film itself.  An entire feature-length film that can be played in vertical format on a smartphone?  I’m excited to see what I could do.  The obvious answer is to make a horror movie, because the limited shape would heighten viewer frustration and anxiety.  At the same time, would you be able to raise as much tension?

Even from a business perspective, the Facebook talk was enlightening in so many ways.  Facebook manages to provide as much convenience as possible for advertisers, and I just wonder what I could possibly do as a college student to start utilizing the platform.

After this talk, I went to the Inspiration Stage to attend a talk from Alibaba.  What Happens When Hollywood Meets Silicon Valley? was… disappointing.  Similar to the Mario Testino talk from a few days ago, it was more of a recounting of experience than an actual lesson or discussion.  Even further, the talk itself didn’t have a clear message.  It felt more like David Hill was patting himself on the 
back for a good job; to be fair, it was an amazing job that he did with the 11.11 shopping festival.

The best session of the day, though, was the Future Five: Female Directors to Watch.  This also wasn’t really a lesson, but it was a showcase of female directors and short films that had premiered at the VOWSS film festival just yesterday in Cannes.  The films were riveting, and showcased the talent of a new generation of directors.  My favorite was a short animated entitled Tough, directed by Jennifer Zhang, about Chinese culture and the immigrant narrative.

I managed to get in contact with the directors of the festival, and while I’m not a female filmmaker, I now have the resources to help a lot of my friends that are in the EMST program.  Even further, I can still be involved with the festivals in the future, if I want to.  And to be honest, I’m very tempted.

There was another amazing session today, and that was with Mattel.  Back to the Future of Branded Content: The Story of Mattel (Re-Imagining Content) depicted the amazing business decisions that Mattel made with their Barbie brand.  And even further, the changes worked towards a greater good for children all across America, if not the world.  What this walk was evidence of was the power of content to drive a business forward, as well as the great versatility that a brand can have in terms of mediums of content.  Books, movies, streaming, and toys all make up the Barbie brand, and each contributes greatly to the overall reputation of the company.  Not to mention, I just love Barbie.

Directly following this talk was another presentation in the Inspiration Stage: What Makes a Great Entertainer?  What followed was a kind of convoluted presentation on the culture of K-Pop, but with heavy emphasis on the value of visual elements in entertainment and music.  Ironically, visuals are almost more important than the music itself: music videos promote styles and cultures, and live performances drive heavy revenue.  Even further, the fan to fan interaction creates its own culture in fandom that drives the reputation of a brand.

Unfortunately, K-Pop isn’t unique in this aspect, no matter how much the presenter really wished that it was.  K-Pop is just like any other form of popular music culture.  The main benefit of this talk was breaking that pattern down to something that could be understood as a formula for success.

My last formal talk of the day was at the Entertainment in Focus stage, where Leo Burnett & Sky presented Content Lessons Through the World of Entertainment.  I… Um…

I’m really not sure what this presentation was supposed to be about.  I’m actively looking down at my notes from it right now, and maybe I’m just really tired, but all that I got from it is that “individual ideas work hard to make money and succeed”.

Um.

Anyways, I dropped by the YouTube beach to pick up the Pride Festival schedule and a free “Tree” shirt, got some Dutch fries, and made my way to the Night School.

Which was pretty freakin’ awesome.  I got to dress up as a pizza.  I got to draw a representation of a gay Georgian wedding on a nude beach?  And… wearing Lady Gaga’s meat dress to a dog park.  And………

I got a free T-shirt there too.


Basically, I got free stuff.  It was great.  And I got to throw balls at the main speaker.  There really just… isn’t that much more to say.

June 21, 2017 – Cannes Lions Day 5: #OhMyGodIanMcKellen #Manicures

I will admit, I’m little guilty.  More than just this blog being late, but I skipped the Cannes school.  

But I have very good reason!

But before that, I’d decided to go see Dame Helen Mirren speak about diversity, as you do. The talk with L’Oreal wasn’t necessarily eye-opening, but it was Dame Helen Mirren.  Therefore, elegance.  

It’s like when Isabelle Huppert walks down the red carpet and gazes in the vague direction of where I’m standing.  It’s like when Nicole Kidman claps her hands without letting her rings hit each other.  It’s like Elle Fanning spanking John Cameron Mitchell at a punk rock afterparty.

You get the picture.  It’s iconic.  Even if it retreads old ground.

But back to the guilt.  Yes, I skipped Cannes School.  But it was for a good reason: Sir Ian McKellen.

Now, I understand that I can stream all of the talks following the festival.  However, there is something that needs to be understood.  Sir Ian McKellen has saved my life ten times over throughout my childhood, and I can’t ever express how much he does mean to me as a role model and an idol.  I watched the X-Men films the same time that I’d come out to my parents, and the story itself resonated with me, as it does with many minorities, especially in the LGBT community.  That being said, I didn’t know that Sir Ian was gay at the time.

When I found out, though, I became obsessed.  For the first time, I had a role model who unabashedly represented himself and what he stood for.  While there might have been other icons, had there ever been one that had played both a superhero/villain and a wizard?

Basically, Sir Ian McKellen is awesome, and he gave me a lot of courage to be myself and own my own identity.

Which is what he encouraged during both of his talks today.  (That’s right, there were two.  I went to both.  I’m still slightly guilty, but it was worth it.)  He represented the idea of heroes that were not heterosexual or “mainstream” in terms of identity.  He emphasized the importance of minority representation and icons, both in fiction and in real life.  His stories were entertaining, fun, and overall, enlightening for me.  I have so many questions for him regarding queer activism.  I hope that one day I’ll be able to ask him.

Between these talks, I attended another in the Forum titled Populism, a Catch 22?  It was a discussion on how to build brands to appeal to mass audiences with popular opinions, while also maintaining genuine connections and representations through honesty.  What I found interesting about this is that it really nailed home the idea that brands and advertising exist to lie.  It was a stark difference from many of the other sessions in the festival, as there had been so much emphasis on honesty.  Authenticity, transparency: are these really themes and topics that we are trying to achieve in this industry?  I hope so, but according to this talk, honesty is only around now due to convenience.

More importantly, brands themselves need to make a stand.

There was another talk at the Facebook beach that I attended.  Building a Business; Rebuilding a Community: The Rise of Hiut Denim focused on founder Devid Hieatt and his journey in building a retail company that focuses more on content and branding than on the product.  That doesn’t mean that the product is low quality, not at all – it’s some of the finest denim in the world – it just means that content is what really drives sales and needs more focus in terms of work and innovation.  Furthermore, his startup is about to provide 248 jobs to those in need.

Hieatt pushed hard for social media and the utilization of social media tools.  Even more, he pushed for the humanization of brands.  Contrary to the last talk, he didn’t emphasize it for convenience; humans are what make products, not corporations.  In the end, what’s most important, according to Hieatt, is to “be fucking human”.

Before the big awards show that night, I decided to treat myself to a manicure at the girls’ lounge.  It was a strange experience; all of the women knew each other there, and they were all very focused on the fact that men were wanting manicures.  “How brave” they were, to be doing something so immasculine.  It felt like witnessing a suburban house party from the corner of the dining room.

Of course, I’m just bitter because I got misgendered about fifty times in the span of half an hour.  Even after I told women that I went by they/them pronouns, they would nod as if they were listening and refer to me as “he” when I chose the blue colors for my nails.  “Oh, he looks so good with that color,” they would faun.  I couldn’t tell if it was a genuine compliment, largely because I was too distracted about that fact that I’m not a “he” or a man.

I got tired of correcting them, but hey, at least my nails are pretty.

But finishing the evening with the award show was good.  The Entertainment Lions was something I’d been anticipating all week, because I have just had my mind blown by how imperative film is to the advertising industry.  The fact that so many agencies have and/or are building inhouse film studios is invigorating.  I’m excited to break into the industry, and so much more than I had been before this talk.


You know, the future is looking good, even if there are long walks ahead.

June 20, 2017 – Cannes Lions Day 4: #LongDay #LongerNight

I’m making this post quite late, largely because of two reasons.  One, on the night that all this occurred, I got back at around 1:30AM and was honestly not in the right state of mind to write anything.  (Despite the claims that creativity flourishes while disoriented, I don’t like to test that outside of finals week.)  Secondly, the Internet was out last night.  And so we find ourselves here, playing catchup.

Tuesday morning began bright and early with a talk in the Lumiere theatre from acclaimed fashion photographer Mario Testino.  Interviewed by Elaine Welteroth, the Editor in Chief of Teen Vogue, the talk titled Beyond the Image. Connection. Integrity. Impact., was a lot more of a profile of the artists himself than a discussion of creativity and learning.

That being said, Mario was very adamant that the most important thing about creativity and the business is to be true to yourself.  While this might sound like a cliché, Mario’s background as a Peruvian immigrant into the French advertising world provides a unique insight into what it means to be original.  After spending a lot of time trying to emulate English and French styles in his photography, Mario came to a realization: “I’m not English, I’m not French.  I’m Peruvian…. If you’re true to yourself, you might be the one that people want to follow.”  He learned a new style of his own artform by following his guts and knowing how to please his clients.  If anything, he’s a good businessman.

Speaking of good business, immediately following this talk was a talk from iHeartMedia featuring Ryan Seacrest and musician Halsey.  For reference, I adore Halsey.  Perhaps this makes my impression of this talk a bit biased, but I honestly enjoyed getting to know more about Halsey’s writing and how she forged her own brand.  She focused on the fact that social media turns every individual into a brand, especially in an age when hiring agencies look at social media to begin to understand potential employees.  Even further, she discussed creativity from an organic perspective, discussing how brands need to change and respond to consumers while still keeping on brand.

Further, I tweeted at Ryan Seacrest to do a Dawg chant, and he replied, so that’s kind of a win.

After this talk, I went straight to the Debussy to catch 7 Things I’ve Learned with Ian Glass, the creator of several acclaimed podcasts including Serial, The American Life, and S-Town.  Glass was brilliant, discussing the factors that build a good story, and how audio and visuals can combine to build an even more compelling product.  As a film major, I was enthralled.  I loved his breakdown of what makes a story: Catalyst, Conflict, and Resolution in order to answer a question or theme.  Often, this can offer social critique.  In the end, though, the story itself doesn’t matter nearly as much as how you tell it; the medium can make almost any story compelling.

I remained after this for another talk in the Debussy hosted by DRUM OMG.  Creating Global Cultural Movements brought Hamish Hamilton to the stage, the director of Done & Dusted, a live entertainment company that has headed the Super Bowl Halftime Show, the Grammys, and the 2012 Olympics Opening Ceremony.  Hamilton’s largest message was to embrace the unexpected.  Businesses need to take risks, and he provided several examples of when they paid off, as well as times when it didn’t.  Overall, however, the risks themselves are what makes stories and advertising touch the hearts of audiences.

Following this, I took some time to go watch some Russian advertising and get a head start on both my commercial reviews (which I’m working on), as well as my international advertising project.  There was not nearly enough Russian advertising to watch, but there seems to be a clear aesthetic of post-modernist meme culture, and the stereotypical Russian desolation that we all know and love.

My final talk of the day took place at the Innovation Lions.  Hyper Reality: Risks and Rewards of Surreal Visuals in Advertising, hosted by Shutterstock, brought filmmaker Keiichi Matsuda to the front to talk about his latest film, which ponders on the consequences of integrated technology and 
innovation to the detriment of social human life.

God, I hated it.

In all honesty, I hate most dystopias.  Simply put, most people do them wrong.  One of the only good dystopias that has been written in the 21st century was The Hunger Games series.  Besides that, no good dystopia has been made since the Cold War.  I actually wrote in my notes that real dystopia needs to focus on the loss of freedom or the threat to what we consider to be moral values of society.  Instead… Hyper-reality was just cynical.  Cynicism is, in my opinion, just another form of lazy writing.

The film itself was well put together, despite the overarching clichés of technological dystopia that were embedded in its plot and concept, but it did provide possible views of what could happen.  However, I still like to think that corporations are run by human beings.

To end the night, we went to the awards show, which included the cyber awards, the category that I’m studying.  Of the golds, I think that my favorite was probably A Love Song Written By a Murderer from Peru.  (Even further, I think it should have gotten a Glass Lion.)

And finally, the parties.  Tonight, I’d RSVP’d for the Pixels of Fury design competition up on the Terrace.  The party went late, and the designs were ridiculous.  I was particularly fond of the design that parodied Fearless Girl – with a naked man on a red carpet.  Even more, I realized that, even under stress, design is always fun.

Nearly every talk makes me want to change my major.  (Too bad I love film.)

Monday, June 19, 2017

June 19, 2017 – Cannes Lions Day 3: #WomenIndustries #TransparentPR

Unlike the film festival, every morning so far has been an early one.  That being said, I also haven’t partied that much at this festival, so it’s kind of an even tradeoff.

To start off our third day, my first talk was at 10:00AM in the Lumiere Theatre.  Titled “Woman and Cinema”, the panel was a repeat from previous years moderated by Claudia Gonzalez Romo, the Special Adviser and Chief of Global Advocacy with UNICEF.  This year, the talk consisted of Chairwoman and Global Chief Creative Officer of Saatchi & Saatchi, Kate Stanners, Australian film director Gillian Armstrong, and CEO of Peral & Dean, Kathryn Jacob, OBE.

The panel was insightful, with key quotes from Mrs. Armstrong.  “There is a feminine perspective, and it’s not just feminine products,” she said, when it came to advertising for women.  The role of women in advertising and creative film in general was emphasized as offering a more accurate perspective as to how women view the world.

That being said, The Beguiled was included on a reel of upcoming films of 2017 to watch.  (It’s ironic because The Beguiled is the least feminist movie of 2017.  Just saying.)

Overall, the talk was amazing, if a little dominated by Mrs. Armstrong compared to the other speakers on the panel, but everything that was said was relevant to the changing industry of Hollywood as it struggles to become more diverse as a business.

Following this, I took a small break to view the work up for awards this evening.  Several pieces stood out to me, including The Unusual Football Field campaign for the AP Thailand Public Company, which focused on innovative urban planning as a force of community building.  I also took a moment to stop by the innovation stage, where several presentations of new technologies and ideas were being showcased at short, ten-minute pitches.

One of these pitches, for Project Bloks, was meant to be a coding training set for children, but which could also be applicable to adults.  The technology itself was fascinating, opening doors for creative thinking with new products and designs.  And what’s even more impressive is that the presentation was finished in less than ten minutes.

Finally, it came time for me to go to the MM&M, Campaign, and Haymarket cabana for a talk on the relevance of PR in the modern age of advertising.  It seems that PR is more important than ever, especially as consumers are starting to demand more and more transparency from large corporations.  

Consumers want to be able to trust the people they buy from, but without good PR relations, it’s much more difficult to build this relationship.

Furthermore, I learned a lot about how the film industry plays a large role in advertising and branding.  Branded films and film festivals are providing more and more opportunities for upcoming filmmakers to break into the industry.  All it takes is a bit more work.

Following this talk, I attended a short session at the Discovery Stage.  Design Forward: Creating for the Future, hosted by Digital McKinley Vice President of Experience Design, Mr. Indy Saha, focused on tips that drive innovation forward in both advertising and technology.  He focused on how startups need to look ahead before the consumer does.  While I agreed with a lot of his main points, some of the details and small biases that he chose to represent made me uncomfortable.  I left the talk but informed, but also wanting to argue with him for a further twenty minutes about the value of consumer privacy and trust.

As I said, PR is more important than ever, and not all entrepreneurs understand that.

Despite the Demi Lovato talk happening, and the New Yorker talk that followed, I decided to go to The Workshop for a new presentation on Social Innovation.  This workshop focused on innovation to inspire social change for issues around the world, and how to start it up yourself.  Consider that I work in Queer activism and health activism at UGA, it felt appropriate for me, especially as our groups attempt to come up with new ideas for fundraising and raising awareness.

In our workshop, my group focused on domestic violence.  A study a few years ago showed that, following sporting events, regardless of the outcome, the quantity of domestic violence reports  increased.  We decided to use this statistic to send a message to the abusers: find healthy, alternative outlets for excess energy.  Our solution was to deliver a physical app that allowed users to utilize augmented reality to play the sports they had just viewed.

The workshop was fairly distracted, considering that the majority of my table had to leave early for other talks, but I was still inspired and impressed by the overall message of the workshop, which emphasized simplicity in innovation.

My last talk of the day was titled Daughters of the Evolution.  Hosted by Goodby Silverstein & Partners, with specific host being author and filmmaker Lauren Greenfield, the daughters of amazing women in the advertising industry came on stage with their mothers to discuss.  Sophie Lefebure, daughter of Pum Lefebure of Design Army, Kia Medlock, daughter of the CCO of Leo Burnett in North America, CEO in Canada Judy John, and Vivian McHugh, daughter Margaret Johnson of Goodby Silverstein, were all present to talk about how their mothers’ work has affected their lives, and how it’s affected their stances in life as young women themselves.

The talk became a discussion on parenthood; how do we have families and also pursue our careers?  Is it worth it?  Despite the doubts that each of the mothers admitted to, the answer was a resounding “yes”.  I found myself more connected with this talk than with any of the others today, because it reminded me of my own mother.  My relationship with her is the strongest one in my life, and even though I’m not a woman, she has inspired me to still be strong for myself and stand for my own identity, both in gender neutrality and in race.

To finish off the night, what better way than with the awards show?  Big winners of course included “Meet Graham” and “Pass the Heinz” campaigns, but there were two other campaigns that I was a little surprised by.  For one, I was surprised that “The Trafficking Exam” had received a bronze lion for outdoor.  For a campaign that is so wrapped in secrecy due to necessity, what kind of outdoor advertising has there been?

Secondly, I wasn’t necessarily surprised, but more resigned to see “Fearless Girl” win the Grand Prix for both outdoor and the Glass Lions.  It’s not that I don’t like the campaign; I love it and I think it’s brilliant.  To be one of only six statues dedicated to women in the entire city of New York is as frustratingly sad as it is remarkable, and the campaign itself has had a global impact.

I just wish that it didn’t erase a message of the immigrant narrative in consequence, especially in this political climate.  Immigration is already under fire.  To make our story (I am a second generation) more invisible in favor of relatively first-world feminism just seems to be a setback.  Not only for the relevance of immigration to America, but also for the world of guerilla art.  To be completely fair, I still believe that Fearless Girl is essential to the message of feminism in America (of which I consider myself to be a part).  However, it’s important to look back and see, in hindsight, the unintentional consequences that marketing can make to campaigns and symbols that are equally as important.


That being said, we don’t want to talk about politics while in France.  So instead, I got a giant steakburger and milkshake from Steak n’ Shake, and we all decided to call it a night.

Sunday, June 18, 2017

June 18, 2017 – Cannes Lions Day 2 - #ContentCreators #TerraceParties?

This morning was an early morning.  That being a morning so early that I didn’t get breakfast.  I had signed up for a talk with Rich Levy of FCB Health, which was on a yacht, but was also at 9:30 in the morning.  Which is, like, the study abroad equivalent of an 8:00AM class.

So, essentially, I was dead.

It was an awesome talk though, where I got some clarification regarding The Trafficking Exam and the #BloodEquality campaign.  Overall, it was productive, and I thoroughly enjoyed the atmosphere of innovation that Rick exudes when he speaks.

Following this was another special talk for us students, this one being with representatives from Publicis Health.  Similar to Rich’s talk, which was essentially a pitch for McCann and FCB Health, the presentation from Publicis was basically a pitch to apply to work for them.

There seems to be an air of anxiety surrounding healthcare marketing.  I’m not completely aware of the history, but based on the social media I follow, I’d been under the impression that healthcare advertising and marketing had always been focused on innovation and spreading awareness of new technologies within medical science.  Unfortunately, this is evidently not how the advertising industry approaches the topic.  Instead, the industry sees healthcare advertising as being little more than a consumer product – or maybe that’s just the insecurity that Publicis Health failed at hiding from us.  
Either way, I think that most healthcare marketing agencies need to have more confidence in themselves and their impact on the medical world.

(Although, the Claritin ad campaign could really be revamped.  I could imagine something more intense, like a Nike advert.)

Following these meetings, I finally had a moment to visit some talks of my own.  Unfortunately, the talk I wanted to view in The Forum was full, so we had to go to the screening room upstairs.  It was harder to pay attention up in the screening room, due to lowered volume and a hefty dose of my own ADD, but the talk itself was interesting.  The Future of Modern Storytelling and New Media, hosted by Code and Theory, featured speakers Dan Gardener, the Co-Founder and Executive Creative Director of Code and Theory, Kathryn Minshew, the Founder and CEO of The Muse, Mick Purzycki, the CEO of FuckJerry Media, and Damon Berger, the Vice President of Global Strategic Partnerships with Fullscreen Media.

Each of these speakers provided unique views as to how to run independent content creation and media networks.  They emphasized change and adaptation to keep up with social media and popular culture, as well as riding more on the side of liberal politics.  That being said, a large emphasis was placed on individuality and competition, making it necessary to differentiate yourself from your competition, especially as you foster your company’s independent brand.

Immediately after this, we rushed to the basement of the Palais to The Workshop, in order to work with The Supergroup on building coding and light circuit boards with the Arduino micro-controller.  This workshop, entitled Let’s Get Physical!: Explore the World of Creative Technology was a blast, with speakers Gabe Aldridge, Brad Lewis, and John Preziotti all representing The Supergroup.  Based in Atlanta, is was amazing to get to work with these guys and then further discuss creative technology and solutions to problems.  Creative technology design, such as light-sensing technology, is fascinating to me, and getting a better understanding of the basics gives me a new respect for computer science and engineering.

And finally, the event I’d been waiting for for the past two days: Classic Hollywood Meets the YouTube Generation: Who Are the Fans Following?  Hosted by Ketchum in the Lumiere Theatre with speaker Marcus Peterzell, this talk featured two of my favorite people: actress Laura Dern, and YouTuber Grace Helbig.

The talk was amazing.  Laura and Grace both focused heavily on content-creators, favoring the independence that YouTube offers to artists and creators.  At the same time, they addressed the difficulties of working in a more freelance-oriented industry, especially as advertising is growing to independent content creators.  I was blown away, and even more quickly, whisked away to our project brief.

Following the Microsoft project brief, and then a small meeting at the Connections Beach Happy Hour, Courtney and I headed home to change for the party.

Which never happened.

Because apparently students aren’t allows into parties?  Despite our complete passes?

So, now we’re in Ellis and my room.  Drinking wine and writing our blogs.  And listening to Future, and preparing for the concert that we actually RSVP’d for.  But ultimately, today was a good day of good talks, and a tamer finish.

And according to Courtney, as of just two seconds ago, “Trump is screwed.”


What else can I ask for in a day?

Saturday, June 17, 2017

June 17, 2017 - Cannes Lions Day 1: #HealthLions #CulturalPhenomenon

Similar to the Cannes Film festival, I now have a stack of magazines that is, frankly, a little ridiculous.  But you also know that I’m going to read all of them.  That’s right, the Cannes Lions festival has (un)officially started, and what better way to kick off the International Festival of Creativity (read: Corporate Advertising) than with health?

Okay, that sounded a little cynical.  In reality, Cannes Lions is already one of the best experiences of my life, and I’ve barely finished with the first day.  Everyone around me is just teeming with ideas and excitement, and I almost feel like a little kid in a candy store.  Or like a nerd.  Let’s go with that.

But onto what I did today!  Me being me, I decided that the best way to start off my Cannes Lions experience was to go to a gay panel.  Because I have my priorities… straight.

Applying Blood Pressure: Achieving Blood Equality Together With the FDA was probably the perfect first panel.  Hosted by Mike Devlin, EVP Creative Director for FCB Health, along with speakers Kelsey Louie, CEO of Gay Men’s Health Crisis, and Joy Barclay of ViiV Healthcare, the panel focused on the stigma that gay and bisexual men face when trying to donate blood – more specifically, that they are not allowed.

Since the 1980s, any man that has had sexual contact with another man since 1977 has faced a lifetime ban on donating blood according the FDA regulations.  This is largely based on an honor system under the dreaded “Question 34” on donor applications.  While men could lie about their sexual history, they shouldn’t have to, especially if they know their status.

The panel focused on the #BloodEquality campaign that FCB ran in collaboration with the Gay Men’s Health Crisis, a PR and social media-driven campaign that emphasized that we all share #OneBlood.  The response to this campaign has been tremendous, with the FDA reducing the ban from life-time sexual activity to one-year celibacy.  While this isn’t the solution (and, debatably, isn’t progress), in the public eye it is making a difference in the confidence of gay and bisexual men.  Further, the campaign itself has been invited to have an exhibit at the Civil Rights Museum in Birmingham.

The presentation was amazing, and even further, the relevance of the campaign to my own work with AIDS Athens and Lambda Alliance motivated me to work harder.  Ironically, however, despite their name in the title, the FDA never showed up.  Mike Devlin blamed it on “regime changes” in the US.  Not to point any fingers, but… some small ones might have dug around in federal policy since their inauguration.

After the panel, I was able to talk with the speakers, and further inquire into their campaign.  Specifically, I wanted to know how they handled the intersection of gay and bisexual men who also are people of color.  Statistically, gay black men have a 1 in 2 chance of getting HIV, compared to the 1 in 10 chance that gay men as a whole have.  Given that the campaign has been invited to the Civil Rights museum, I felt that it would be appropriate for the campaign to expand to that area of discussion.

Long story short: I got their business cards.

Following this talk, I attended a short presentation by The Bloc and HAP Innovations on how Health Tech is becoming more human.  Following that, I rushed to the Debussy Theatre (Now with an indoor entrance!  Fancy!) to view Why Are We Creative, a seminar by the Emotional Network.  It was… disappointing.  Unorganized, tangential, and ultimately no more than a weak showcase for a shoddy-looking documentary, I was more focused on how hungry I was getting than on the words themselves.

But before I could eat, I had one more panel to stop at.  Healthy Storytelling: The Importance of Embracing the Dark Side, a panel hosted by AESOP branding.  The speakers were Nick Dutnall of AESOP, Tanial Boler, CEO and founder of Chiaro, and John Duncan, a publisher with VICE Media.  The panel focused on telling the truth with advertising, especially in health.  People need stories to become engaged with a product, and no story is more engaging than the truth.  At least, that’s what Mr. Dutnall argued.  I can’t say I disagree.

After a short meal break, I went to my last panel of the day.  The New Tribes of Arabia, a seminar hosted by Yousef Tuqan, doubled as both a showcase and a discussion as to the changing social media culture of the Middle East, specifically in countries around the Arabian peninsula.  The cultures here, joined more by ancestry and tribes than by national boundaries, constantly fight between tradition and change, and it shows in the radical marketing and popular culture that is emerging.

Highlighted in the presentation, Tuqan brought up subjects such as the Arabian techno-rock band Mashrou’ Leila (who I now follow on Spotify), the Saudi Arabia ComiCon, women’s rights movements, and graffiti artists.  There was constant conflict, constant setbacks, and, above it all, constant hope for continued change.  Despite respecting cultural traditions, popular culture still managed to rise and make its own adaptations.  Overall, it was a powerful presentation that I want to watch again and again.

Finally, what better way to end my first day at Cannes Lions than to attend the Health Lions award show?  The Lumiere Theatre is completely transformed from how it looked during the film festival – and can I say, I kind of like it?

The biggest winner of the night was McCann Health India’s Immunity Charm campaign, which was a Gold Lion for Awareness & Advocacy, as well as the Grand Prix for Good.  Furthermore, the campaign won McCann Health India the award of Healthcare Network of the Year.  Unsurprisingly, the Grand Prix went to the Meet Graham campaign.

However, the most mysterious winner of the night was The Trafficking Exam campaign by Area 23 agency with Polaris.  Due to the sensitive, most likely classified, information of the subjects of human trafficking, no information was given about the project.  This didn’t stop the campaign from winning a Gold Lion in Awareness & Advocacy, and, even further, winning Area 23 the Healthcare Agency of the Year Award.

Needless to say, I’m intrigued.  I’m looking forward to seeing more developments with this campaign, if and when it’s revealed to the public.  Meanwhile, I’m going to go get my signature 1 euro gelato in Juan-les-Pins, and get ready for an early morning tomorrow with FCB Health.

Thursday, June 8, 2017

Experiential Paper

On the topic of La La Land, it was one of my favorite films of 2016.  From the opening number, to the masterpiece that is the closing monologue, Damian Chazelle manages to express every single reason why I love cinema.  Call me naïve, but I dream of that world.  Maybe reality hasn’t sunk in yet, or maybe I’m just not yet jaded with the industry, but for me, film really creates that sense of indescribable magic that artists fight to achieve every single day.  For me, movies like La La Land only push me to work even harder.
There are many moments that continue to remind me why I chose to follow film.  Every awards season, every time I get that center seat four rows from that back of the theatre, that time I watched James Cameron’s Avatar from the very back wedged in between my mother and a stranger who cried at Sigourney Weaver’s death; Billy Crystal’s opening monologue at the 84th Academy Awards, debating with my friends about which movie we want to see on a last-minute decision at the ticket booth, when my uncle took me to the midnight premiere of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince and we sat in the front row and when the hand shot out of the lake the entire theatre jumped in unison.  Staying up late to watch old recordings of Julie Andrews interviews.  Dusting out the old VCR player so I can watch my Apo’s tape of 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea with slightly less fuzz than usual.  Posting a film review at 3AM because I couldn’t sleep and that one shot from Gravity was stuck in my mind.  Calling my mom and crying with her to tell her that I’d gotten into the Cannes Film Festival program.
My relationship with film is filled with sentimentality.  At the heart of it, film makes me into a child.  I’m entranced.  I fall in love as I’m immersed into a world, no matter how close or how distanced from reality it takes me.  I often say that the best movies are those that make me cry; even further, the best movies are those that make me feel real emotions.
Outside of our program, I met two people who had a complete and genuine love of film.
The first was an older woman named Linda Leonard.  She is a professor at the Boulder Psychotherapy Institute, here for the first time on invitation from her university.  She is obsessed with theories of universality, of a shared human consciousness that encompasses the globe.  The fact that a flood story exists in every ancient culture; the fact that the Hero’s Journey is a common theme in international literature – these similarities and aesthetics that attract human psychology is what she focuses on when she watches film.
What’s hilarious about this is that we both enjoyed completely different films.  Linda loved A Man of Integrity, which I fell asleep in.  She didn’t enjoy Wonderstruck, which I adored.  We both had mixed feelings regarding Jupiter’s Moon.  There was an equilibrium that we attempted to find, but we often found ourselves at opposite ends of the spectrum.  But we both loved how film could relate to audiences, and how film struck different chords of significance depending on life experiences.  We discussed the theories of studying film, or comparing film to literature, and of film in relation to philosophy.
The second person I met was a film student from Italy named Bianca Briocchieri.  For the second year in a row, she had a cinephile badge, and she epitomized that word to a T.  Bianca adores film, and she’s attending graduate school at Oxford for film criticism in the fall.  We met at the premiere of Loveless, seated high in the balcony section so that the screen was at an angle.
For the entire hour before the movie started, we talked about everything, from David Fincher to Jean Luc Godard, from Captain America: The Winter Soldier to The Graduate.  We debated the benefits of a compilation score versus an original orchestration; I personally hate the former, given the rare exception, but Bianca loves them.  We both love David Fincher, and she was ecstatic to be able to see the premiere of Le Redoutable later in the week.
Both of these people that I met at Cannes love film.  Both take completely different approaches to their love for it.  Linda analyzes film.  She breaks it down into Freudian meaning, studying the characters and the motivation, with little attention to the pacing or the technique.  She likes to analyze moments of a story, elements that related to movements of art as a whole instead of the movie itself.  Bianca, on the other hand, loves to watch a film.  She doesn’t understand how people could leave movies early, even in market screenings.  She wants to see every shot, every cut, and every expression that could be placed on a screen.  Bianca watches film as an art, and criticizes it in the same way.
What I noticed, though, is that I also analyze film in my own way.  I prefer the emotions.  I boil film down to those abstract subjects that exist only for myself.  I relate films to how they make me feel, their personal importance to myself, and I become biased.  Yes, I care about technique, but then I see a film like In the Fade, which, while not as technically brilliant as Loveless, I find myself preferring because of how I relate to it.  They, the film, might not have been as narratively sound as The Killing of a Sacred Deer, but I’m so emotionally connected to the subject that I can’t turn it away.
I watch films very much like my mother, to the point where our tastes in movies is inconsistent because of how we let our own lives interpret the scripts.
The point of this is, from Cannes, I realized more than anything that there is no perfect film.  There might be a documentary that premieres that is literally a home video, or there might be a huge studio blockbuster that uses every shred of capitalism to its advantage.  And while we can argue that one is better than the other, and one probably is, at the same time, every person will watch these films differently.  Film criticism has a place in the industry, simply because it allows us to express our love for film as how it pertains to ourselves.  Some of us will analyze film based solely on the story, others only on the technique.  Many of us will argue about representation, and again some of us are so used to it that we take what we can.
There are flaws in this industry, sure, but I don’t think that the solution is to become jaded.  What I learned from Cannes is that there is nothing wrong with the excitement I feel whenever I watch a film.  I learned that I’m going to disagree about everything with at least one other person, and I learned that that’s what makes this industry worth it.  No matter what anyone says, film really is something that we can’t take for granted, and it’s worth working for.

May 28, 2017 - Cannes Film Day 12

The festival is over!

After twelve days, the 70th Cannes Film Festival has finished.  And I gotta say, it's a little sad.  I could genuinely cry.

If I wasn't so angry about Coppola winning the Best Director award.

But I digress.  120 Battements par Minute won the Jury Prize, and Diane Kreuger won Best Actress for In the Fade, so I really can't complain at all.  Except that Killing of a Sacred Deer TIED for best screenplay along with You Were Never Really Here.  Which... well, at least it won.

Nevertheless, I still managed to fit in two more films today!  The first one I saw was Jupiter's Moon, a film that everyone had been talking up in our program.  Visually, it was incredible.  Narrative-wise... Well, I found a moment to go to the bathroom, if that tells you anything.  I did watch it until the end, however.

And then, instead of trying to get into the closing ceremony (my begging days are FAR behind me), we all decided to go see Le Redoutable, a film about the life of Jean-Luc Godard following the failure of his film Le Chinoise.

It was hilarious.  It felt like a Wes Anderson film, but even sharper in its humor.  It was completely self-aware of its context, and it used it to its advantage.

Ultimately, this was a great way to end our experience at the Cannes Film Festival.  Unfortunately, I also need to catch up on the 50 hours of sleep I sacrificed for this week.

Still, I wouldn't have traded it for the world.

Movie Count: 31

May 27, 2017 - Cannes Film Day 11

And now to the recaps!  I actually woke up SUPER EARLY for this!

I went to go see You Were Never Really Here at the Salle du 60e.  Unfortunately, no one told me that the movie was apparently unfinished, and I had another line to get into.  So....

I walked about with a half hour left.  Oops.

But then I saw Wind River at the Debussey!

AND IT WAS AMAZING!  I've loved Taylor Sheridan's writing ever since he penned Sicario.  And in his first directorial debut?  Stunning.  That's all I can say.  Add in the amazing lead performances of Jeremy Renner and Elizabeth Olsen, and I'm sold.  It was good.

See it when it comes out in August.

Finally, in the evening, after a long day of getting changed, doing work, and mildly networking in the Am Pav, all of us (about 20 of us) got together to see the final showing of Patti Cake$, a movie that JCM recommended to us about a white girl growing up in New Jersey who wants to be a rapper.

I thought I was going to cringe through this movie.  Instead, I was laughing and cheering by the end of it, along with everyone else in the theatre.  Despite it not necessarily being a revolutionary film, it was great, and it's one that everyone can enjoy.

Overall, this is turning into a great way to wind down the festival.  Here's to tomorrow!

Movie Count: 29

Despite convention, In the Fade is a brilliant drama that brings reality closer

In my opinion, the best movies are the ones that make you cry.  To be fair, I cry in most movies, both during the happy and the sad, but there a few films I watch that are so moving that I lose myself in the emotion.  To me, the best movies are those that take me away from reality.  They immerse me, they horrify me, they elate me, and after they’re done, it takes me a moment to come back to reality.  And more often than not, given all this surge of emotion, when I find myself back in my seat in the movie theatre or blinking at the computer screen on my lap, it’s with tears running down my cheeks.
For me at Cannes this year, there were several films.  Loveless left me empty, helpless, and yet still satisfied.  The Killing of a Sacred Deer made me feel absurd, horrified, and disoriented me as I walked out onto the street.  A little closer to reality, it took me an hour to stop gushing after I came out of 120 Beats per Minute.  However, the film that really left me wrecked, and that gave me such a sense of fulfillment after watching leaving the theatre, was one that didn’t take me away from reality at all.  This film was none other than Fatih Akin’s Aus dem Nicths.
Apart from any emotional bias that I have towards this film, In the Fade is brilliant, using convention to its advantage, despite a narrative that offers little surprise past its second act.  Told in three chapters, In the Fade introduces us to Katja Sekerci (Diane Kruger), her Turkish husband Nuri (Numan Acar), and their son Rocco.  It’s impossible not to fall in love with this family immediately, which makes it all the more heart wrenching when Nuri and Rocco are killed in a bomb explosion less than ten minutes into the film.
This is the premise of In the Fade.  We follow Katja as she grapples with the grief of this tragedy, first through dealing with her surviving family – including her pregnant sister, her mother, and her in-laws – and then through the courtroom proceedings as it is revealed that foul play is afoot.  Despite her husband’s criminal history with drugs, Katja knows that he has no real definable enemies.  That is, except for those who target him simply for his nationality.
For many, In the Fade could be interpreted as a story of grief and tragedy, of lost motherhood and the will to go on, and even one as revenge.  All of these categorizations are correct.  However, director Akin refuses to allow the true motivation, and the true villains of the movie, to go unnoticed.  And if the audience wasn’t aware of it by the end of the film, the closing title card makes it impossible to miss: the true message of In the Fade is a protest against Neo-Nazism and the corruption of the judicial system in regards to political ideologies.
This is where In the Fade finds it’s brilliance.  It is one of the few films that refuses to back down from its controversial subject and find a definitive stance, even among nuance.  Akin is careful to fully expand on the moralities of all his characters: the victim, Nuri, is a former convict on drug dealing and possession charges.  Katja is a hard drug user herself, especially in her grief, and further attempts suicide, both actions which proceed to demonize her in court.  Her lawyer, Danilo (Denis Moschitto), is the one who gave her the drugs to cope.  All of these characters have developed moralities that swing between what is deemed socially acceptable and what can, and has, landed them in prison.  In the Fade refuses to hide any of it.
The one thing that In the Fade refuses to excuse, and refuses to find any sympathy for, is Nazism.  Akin is savage in his attack, naming the ideology as the senseless prejudice that it is, and the force with which his writing pushes it is what brings it to triumph.  This isn’t to say that there isn’t any sympathy for the two human villains; they are seen as happy together, and they have built a life.  All they want after their crimes is to live peacefully.
Akin then proceeds to ask, though: Do they deserve it?  And the answer is a resounding “no”.
For many, In the Fade can be seen as formulaic.  Going into its second act, it becomes embroiled in procedural drama, and even further, the ending becomes predictable.  However, it is an ending that is fully desired and completely satisfying, and the plot itself represents reality.
In the Fade doesn’t have to try to be relevant, which only makes the narrative itself more heartbreaking.  It succeeds in forging a reality that, for many, hits so close to home that it produces emotions far beyond a blinding rage and a deepening sorrow.  It doesn’t try to explain the unexplainable – for example, how such hatred can exist – and instead tries to show us the inevitable that comes from such violence.
Diane Kreuger delivers a performance that leaves a striking impression, bringing us into the reality of her grief far more than any typical character study.  Despite the plot’s predictability, the conventions of the courtroom genre and the revenge flick are the only directions in which the narrative can go.  Yes, there is violence, and yes, there is loss of hope, but it is necessary to represent this story to the best of its ability, and ultimately works towards its advantage.  We become immersed in Katja’s grief and her confusion at the world that she finds herself in, and ultimately we are given what all fiction strives to create: truth.
Going into In the Fade expecting something revolutionary in narrative storytelling is a fruitless effort.  It’s irrelevant to the work as a whole.  What you can expect instead is a story that we might have heard a thousand times – both on the news, and in our history books – and yet it makes sure that you can’t mistake it once again.  There is no hiding from the state of reality when watching Akin’s work.  There is no way to avoid talking about the rising alt-right movements across the glove.  There is no other topic. Grief, revenge, rage, fear; all of these emotions are just as real as the fiction that is being told, and for so many is a reality off of the screen.
To focus only on these aspects, and to reduce In the Fade to a simple character study goes against the final message of the film itself.  Like all of the best films, it is necessary to synthesize these emotions, and to allow yourself to be immersed.  You must accept reality as it is presented, and only then will you be able to appreciate the brilliance that Akin has provided for us.  And the most striking thing?  For so many of us who watch In the Fade, the reality we find doesn’t change when we exit the theatre.

In the Fade


Director Fatih Akin
Writers Fatih Akin, Hark Bohm
Stars Diane Kruger, Denis Moschitto
Producers
Fatih Akin
Running Time 1h 46

Genre Drama

Charming and unoffensive, The Big Bad Fox and Other Tales plays it safe for television distribution

Back in 2013, while Disney’s Frozen took the world by perpetual snowstorm, French animation studio Folivari quietly released a film entitled Ernest et Celestine.  Based on a children’s book by Gabrielle Vincent, Ernest et Celestine follows the friendship in crime between a bear and a mouse in a charming story that went on to receive critical acclaim and a nomination at the American Academy Awards for Best Animated Feature.  Lifted by fluid traditional animation, an adorable cast, and an inspiring message, Ernest et Celestine raised Folivari to an international market with a formidable audience in children’s film.
With its newest project, the animation studio and its returning director Benjamin Renner seem to have taken a step back.  Intentionally made for television and already acquired by Studiocanal for French distribution, The Big Bad Fox & Other Tales (Le Grand Méchant Renard et autres contes), has debuted in safe waters.  To that same extent, the film’s narrative is as unoffensive as it is simple, despite the potential it had to further expand on traditional animation and storytelling.
The Big Bad Fox is set up as a frame story in three parts; a group of farm animals are professional actors in theatre, putting on a show for the audience.  Using this narrative, they tell three short stories.  The first, A Baby to Deliver, tells the story of a Pig who unfortunately receives a baby from a Stork who refuses to do his job.  Partnered with an incompetent pair of a Duck and a Rabbit, he must deliver the baby to Avignon, hopefully without killing it.  The second story is The Big Bad Fox, which follows the eponymous Fox as he tries to steal chickens to feed himself and his malevolent friend Wolf.  Since eggs are easier to steal, he decides to steal them and raise the chickens as his own to eat, with hilarious results.  The final story is titled Saving Christmas, which returns the audience to the trio of Pig, Duck, and Rabbit.  The latter two, believing that they have killed Santa, decide that they must deliver the presents themselves, no matter what Pig does to try and convince them to stop with their antics.
Between each of these performances, the animals all come together to present the next short story on the stage, cracking jokes and slipping up.  The film is silly, harmless, and has the same charm as Renner’s previous films, thanks in large part to its flawless animation and character design.  The production value is only helped by a superb voice cast, both in French and English, that helps to immerse the audience into the moving pictures.
Despite all of this, however, the film lacks substance, and floats on the surface of the themes that it had achieved so strongly with Ernest et Celestine.  It’s hard not to compare the two, as the earlier film had relished in its own chaotic charm throughout its narrative.  It also remained consistent, and it set a standard for the studio that one could only hope to see again.  That being said, The Big Bad Fox was made specifically for television.  Renner never had the intention for large theatrical release, and perhaps that can explain some of the lapses in this newest film that are found predominantly in the frame narrative.
The idea of the animals being actors presenting these short stories is hilarious, in a good way.  The Fox doubles as the main presenter of the stories as well, and the writing for the film highlights the differences between the actor and the roles he plays.  There is a palpable confidence that appears when the Fox plays his character, but as the host he has a nervous energy that just begs for approval.  It only adds to the charm and depth of these characters, and at some points adds an extra bit of humor.
For example, the Stork is seen as a traditional, egotistical Shakespearian actor, and it shows as he plays his character.  With bombast pronunciation and a deep, booming voice, he dominates the stage during his performance.  However, in the frame narrative between the shows, the Stork asks the audience if they enjoyed his performance.  “Unlike these other actors, I am classically trained!  You should come see my performance in-“ he declares before he is tugged off the stage.  It’s amusing, with a smart humor that takes advantage of the film’s premise.
Unfortunately, The Big Bad Fox doesn’t do this enough.  Instead, the intermissions become shorter and shorter, with the finale being a single sentence before the curtain call.  In fact, by the end of the film, there is little justification for the frame narrative at all; the stories, despite having the same characters, feel like isolated episodes in Renner’s own creation.
Given the irresistible charm of Ernest et Celestine, there is no disappointment to be found in the style and humor of The Big Bad Fox.  However, there is little keeping this film afloat except for this charm, and it’s clear that it’s not looking for that praise either.  With The Big Bad Fox, Renner presents an inoffensive, cute, and ultimately harmless animated storybook, which, while perhaps not captivating enough for a theatrical release, is perfect for the television release it was intended for.  In the future, one can only hope for another powerhouse from Folivari.

The Big Bad Fox & Other Tales


Directors Benjamin Renner, Patrick Imbert
Writers Jean Regnaud, Benjamin Renner
Stars Guillaume Dernault, Guillaume Bouchede, Jules Bienvenu
Producers
Folivari
Running Time 1h 19

Genre Animation

May 26, 2017 - Cannes Film Day 10

Going into the double digits, and I finally woke up on time!  It wasn't for a movie, though.

Instead, I went to go to several lectures and panels in the Marche.  Which, retroactively, I feel should count as movies.  Alas, they don't.

First, I went to a talk in the short film corner from a representative from Google Infinite Deviation, a production division that provides funding to some projects that depict minority characters, specifically women, that practice coding.  It was an interesting talk about representation of minorities in media as more than just their demographic, emphasizing character development and individuality.

The second talk I went to was one by Brett Ratner, a film producer who has worked on films such as those in the X-Men franchise and Tower Heist.  He was a brilliant man to talk to, is a little cliched, but ultimately I feel like I did learn from him.  If anything, I learned how to be persistent and was inspired by his words.

The one movie I did see today... Oh my lord, it was amazing.

I saw Fatih Akin's In the Fade, an amazing drama chronicling a woman's journey through grief after her husband and son are killed by neo-Nazis.  Holy crap, this film was good.  I loved it.  Diane Kreuger is wonderful.  She deserves so many awards.

And it's a film that's relevant?  And it's sad that this film is relevant, but it is.

Please watch it.  I hope it gets picked up for American distribution.

It was beautiful.

Movie Count: 26

Good Time is definitely a good time, even if lackluster in its narrative

Whenever I watch a movie, one of the questions I always ask myself is, “Why was this film created?”  What caused a group of people to come together in this monumental collaboration of visual, audio, and narrative skills?  Was it for the money?  Maybe for the art?  Was it to inform, to educate the audience about some issue?  Or were they just having fun?  Why is this a film, and not a book, or a graphic novel?  What is this movie’s purpose?
This is one of the central questions asked of Robert Pattinson’s character in Good Time.  Constantine “Connie” Nikas is determined that he has a purpose, that everything around him is coming together for some grand reason.  In Good Time, directed by brothers Josh and Ben Safdie, this philosophy comes to the forefront when he and his mentally handicapped brother Nick, played by Ben Safdie, rob a bank.  The heist breaks down into chaos when the bank teller rigs the money bag with red dye, resulting in the Nicholas’ arrest.  Scared, overprotective, and perhaps overconfident, Connie hatches a plan to break his brother out, either through finding the $10,000 needed in bail money, or through sheer force, regardless of the consequences.
The entire story of Good Time takes place in one chaotic night, and Connie’s actions rope in several external players.  While not all of these people are innocent, the important distinction is that they are independent from Connie, and have nothing to do with his story until he drags them in.  Connie wrecks havoc on their lives in the span of less than 24 hours, and ultimately, you have to ask: what was it all for?
Ostensibly, Connie’s goal throughout the film is to save his brother.  In reality, the plot of Good Time is just as distracted and chaotic as it sounds, and it lends itself to further confusion through its dalliances with New York crime and drugs.  What starts off as a thrilling heist movie instead becomes a character study and, even further into the film, a partial portrait of the Queens underworld.  It attempts to create a culmination of the crime in Queens and Brooklyn, but only offers us a snapshot of the life itself through the view of one person.
For me, Good Time, while being deserving of any and all praise it deserves, is unfocused as to the message it truly wants to portray.  (As well as the relentless closeups, but that’s a different story.)  At the start, I had been hopeful that the film would address prison reform in America, or perhaps the failing support and therapy system for those who are mentally handicapped.  The opening sequence seemed promising in this respect, providing images of the neglect for those with mental illnesses in prison.  There were even several scenes throughout the film that address police brutality.  And yet, like so many films that touch on these subjects, Good Time refused to offer any definitive answer.
Films are slow to condemn any violence by any party within their narrative.  It’s difficult to paint one side as wrong and still represent the nuance in the argument.  However, Good Time had every opportunity to expand on several themes, and instead chose to focus on the narcissistic personality of Connie.
Let me be clear: this was not a bad choice.
Connie’s narrative doesn’t address the prison system.  It barely touches on the issues of police brutality, and if it does try to justify protest against it, the argument is weak and avoided altogether.  Instead, similar to the Safdie brothers’ previous films such as Heaven Knows What, Good Time dives into the topics of drugs and addiction, streamlining the cycle of imprisonment through one night and depicting the inescapabilty of the system as a whole.
While it’s never confirmed whether or not Connie has done time before, it’s implied, and the character of Ray (Buddy Duress), immediately falls back into his old habits the day he is released on parole.  Other characters are brought into the mess, including Dash (Barkhad Abdi) and Kid (Taliah Webster), who are completely innocent, but now cannot get away.  In fact, at the end of the story itself, the only character with a chance at redemption is Nick.
Perhaps what this means to highlight is the failing system as a whole, or maybe it’s meant to explore the profiles of those with high-functioning mental illness.  Connie is a brilliant man, if pretentious and ruled by his own narcissism.  However, he is never questioned in the same way that Nick is, as Nick is peaceful in comparison.  Good Time never confirms any of this, however, which is what leaves the film feeling like only one part of a missing picture.



Good Time
Directors Ben Safdie, Josh Safdie
Writers Josh Safdie, Ronald Bronstein
Stars Robert Pattinson, Barkhad Abdi, Jennifer Jason Leigh

Producers Sebastian Bear-McClard, Oscar Boyson, Terry Douglas, Paris Kasidokostas Latsis
Running Time 99 minutes

Genre Crime, Drama

May 25, 2017 - Cannes Film Day 9

Before I get into today, let me explain the reruns.

The Cannes Official Selection has reruns during the last four days of the festival, from Thursday and into Sunday, for all of those movie-watching needs that you didn't get during the premieres.  And the best part: you have to have a Marche badge.

So starting off this day, I already knew which movies I'd been planning to see.

Unfortunately, I overslept.

So, instead, I went to the Am Pav to listen to our good friend John Cameron Mitchell give a talk about film and drag queens, as you do.  It was awesome, and I invited JCM to the annual drag show that we host at UGA.  I'm genuinely hoping he takes me up on that offer.

I only saw one film today, and it was the Olympia premiere of Good Time, by the Safdie brothers and starring Robert Pattinson.  ...Eh?

Eh???

Everyone loved it.  I didn't?  Like, it was a good movie.  I just didn't like it.  Hopefully the reasons so will be clear in my next review.  But ultimately, I feel like the movie tried to be too many things and ended up... pointless.

Still, it's worth a watch, and I don't regret seeing it.

I do regret sleeping through that showing of Rodin, though.

Movie count: 25

May 24, 2017 - Cannes Film Day 8

Today was the day that Kelsey had been waiting for.  But first let's talk about false advertising.

After the nightmare that was trying to get home last night, I will admit that I slept in this morning.  But it's okay!  I had a plan!  Remember how I mentioned I visited the Marche a few days ago and talked to some people?  Well, one of these stands was for Nega, a Japanese animation company that produced Miss Hokusai last year.

This year at Cannes, they were premiering a film called MINT, which I had seen concept art for and was excited to be able to see at the festival.  When I saw that I could make the premiere time, I was ecstatic!

Except for one problem: the film was live action.  Which, by all the promotional posters and trailers I'd seen, should not have been the case.  I was expecting MINT to be a charming animated film with the same aesthetics as much of Makoto Shinkai's work, or perhaps Mamoru Hosoda.  Instead, what director Oku Shutaro had given me was a film that was 95% live action melodrama that couldn't decide whether or not it wanted to be aimed at children or adults.

I was disappointed.

But it's alright, because Kelsey's film was premiering!  She'd been waiting all week to see Sofia Coppola's The Beguiled.  It was for her what The Killing of a Sacred Deer was for me.  That is to say: would do nearly anything to get into a premiere.  And unlike me, Kelsey got in.

Meanwhile, I went to go see it at the Olympia.

I will let you know, I currently have a review for it in my queue.  So for now, let's just say...

I was disappointed.

Oh well, you win some and you lose some.

Movie Count: 24